Greate thanks, you helped me very much.
Greate project and greate creators, not very often it can be seen such
support. Again thanks

2011/12/15 Matthias Kramm <[email protected]>

> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 04:15:29AM -0800, ?????? ??????? <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > let's change questions:
> > 1) how stable is flatten parameter
>
> It's stable. At Scribd, we run it on about 50,000 documents every day,
> so far without problems.
>
> > 2) are there any  negative brood hen of using flatten
>
> In some situations, you might see increased file size, due to the fact
> that strokes are converted to filled polygons (so with --flatten, the
> outlines of lines or curves will be stored, as opposed to just the
> endpoints
> and control points)
>
> > 3) how bad is it using with other parameters(poly2bitmap etc)
>
> Combining poly2bitmap and flatten doesn't make much sense, since both
> remove clip shapes.
> Here are the key differences:
>
> 1.) poly2bitmap removes clip shapes and combines bitmaps and polygons
>    into bitmaps. The output will only contain text and bitmaps.
> 2.) flatten removes clip shapes, but leaves polygons alone. The output
>    will contain text, polygons, bitmaps, gradients, etc.
>
> > 3) What is the maximum number of clip layers it can remove
>
> It will remove all clip layers, regardless of number.
>
> Matthias
>
> ---------------
> SWFTools-common is a self-managed list. To subscribe/unsubscribe, or amend
> an existing subscription, please kindly point your favourite web browser
> at:<http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/swftools-common>
>
---------------
SWFTools-common is a self-managed list. To subscribe/unsubscribe, or amend an 
existing subscription, please kindly point your favourite web browser 
at:<http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/swftools-common>

Reply via email to