> On Dec 16, 2015, at 0:12 , Dave Abrahams via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah but we want to move in the direction of making that more reliable, not
>> less.
>
> I am not sure I agree with you. I would defer to John McCall on this one,
> but my understanding is that it's an explicit non-goal to make that guarantee.
>
>> I forget who but someone said in another thread that global variables can be
>> reliably passed by-ref to functions that take pointers already (even though
>> the Swift documentation does not guarantee this).
This was probably me; I say it a lot when explaining why other solutions don't
work for KVO contexts. I can back Dave up that we're more likely to move away
from guaranteeing persistent addresses for particular kinds of declarations. I
could easily see it being an attribute of some kind, with all other
declarations (including globals) never assumed to have persistent addresses.
You just don't need them very often, and when you do need them you usually know
it up front.
Jordan
_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
