Hi, Seth. Sorry for not getting back to you sooner! I don't think we have 
anything exactly like this, but there's sort of a sequence diagram in Chris and 
Joe's talk at the LLVM conference, "Swift's High-Level IR 
<https://youtu.be/Ntj8ab-5cvE>". I'd say it looks something like this:

1. Parsing
2. Semantic analysis, including type-checking
3. SIL generation
4. Mandatory SIL passes
5. SIL optimization
6. LLVM IR generation
7. LLVM optimization
8. LLVM output (usually including machine code generation and writing to a .o 
file)

…with the last two handled pretty much completely by LLVM <http://llvm.org/> 
itself, and not customized by Swift.

We probably ought to have something like Clang's "Internals 
<http://clang.llvm.org/docs/InternalsManual.html>" manual (hopefully better), 
which lays out the major concepts in each library. As it is we have various 
concepts that are documented very well, either in docs/ or in header comments, 
and others which are just arcane knowledge in the heads of the implementers. 
This is not a good thing.

The "Contributing <https://swift.org/contributing/>" page on the website lists 
a handful of ways to get involved; another one we're still bringing up is 
issues with the "StarterBug" label in JIRA. These are intended to be bugs that 
a newcomer could use as a goal-oriented way to learn about one part of the 
project.

Of course, we're happy to answer any specific questions you might have (and 
this list is probably the right place for them). It's the general ones that are 
hard. :-)

Jordan

> On Dec 16, 2015, at 2:36, Seth Friedman <seth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Jordan!
> 
> Another question if anyone has some time: I'm really interested in 
> contributing to the project, but given that I don't have a ton of experience 
> with compilers, I'm having a really hard time following the flow of the 
> program. I understand that the high level flow is lexing, parsing, sema, and 
> building the AST. However, tracing through the actual functions in the 
> compiler prove much more difficult due to the amount of 
> indirection/metaprogramming.
> 
> Are there any sort of sequence diagrams that I haven't found yet? If anyone 
> could let me know of any good resources you know of, that would be great. I'm 
> sure this would also be of use to people in my boat that want to help but 
> don't know how to start.
> 
> Thanks,
> Seth
> 
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:04 PM Jordan Rose <jordan_r...@apple.com 
> <mailto:jordan_r...@apple.com>> wrote:
> Hi, Seth. I think you're getting Clang / swift-clang mixed up with swiftc / 
> swift. Clang is not the Swift compiler; the Swift compiler lives in the 
> "swift" repo. Swift depends on Clang for its interoperation with C and 
> Objective-C.
> 
> A lot of the compiler encodes information about Optional, but most of it 
> stems from ASTContext.h and ASTContext.cpp, which has dedicated entrypoints 
> for getting Optional, Optional.None, and Optional.Some.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> Jordan
> 
> 
>> On Dec 8, 2015, at 17:59 , Seth Friedman via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org 
>> <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
>> 
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> In Optional.swift in the stdlib, there's a comment that says "The compiler 
>> has special knowledge of Optional<Wrapped>, including the fact that it is an 
>> enum with cases named 'None' and 'Some'."
>> 
>> What I'm trying to understand is: If I wanted to implement the optional type 
>> from scratch, what would be the process I would go through? I've scoured the 
>> swift-clang project and can't seem to find any reference to optionals or 
>> even Swift explicitly. I discovered nullability attributes and am 
>> hypothesizing that an expression of something like "Type?" is somehow mapped 
>> to an attribute, but I'm really just stumbling around in the dark.
>> 
>> In terms of what I've tried, I've gone through a lot of the source in the 
>> swift-clang lib/Basic and lib/AST directories, and I've read through the 
>> "Clang CFE Internals Manual" on the Clang website.
>> 
>> Help is much appreciated!
>> 
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Seth
> 
>>  _______________________________________________
>> swift-dev mailing list
>> swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev 
>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev>
> 

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

Reply via email to