Got it. `contains` is only declared in extension. Interesting workaround. Thanks.
> On Dec 30, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <griboz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Ling Wang via swift-dev > <swift-dev@swift.org> wrote: >> After reviewing the code of stdlib I found no one actually implements >> _customContainsEquatableElement: >> 1. Its default implementation in `SequenceType` just returns nil. >> 2. The implementation in `Set` delegates to `contains` which is bad because >> it reverses their relationship: the default implementation of `contains` in >> `SequenceType` delegates to `_customContainsEquatableElement`. >> 3. In all other place it just delegates to another `SequenceType`. >> >> So no one is doing real work. >> >> If the current _customContainsEquatableElement is only a relic I suggest we >> remove it and clean up related code. > > It is not a relic. It allows the contains() method to perform dynamic > dispatch in case the container knows something extra about the > elements. > > Consider the case when you have a Set typed as a plain Sequence or a > Collection. In that case, you won't be able to call the custom > Set.contains() method, the overload resolution will only see the > protocol extension. This extra entry point, > _customContainsEquatableElement, allows us to perform dynamic dispatch > and use the fast Set implementation if it is available. > > Dmitri > > -- > main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if > (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <griboz...@gmail.com>*/ _______________________________________________ swift-dev mailing list swift-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev