Hi, Kim. The test result is same on WSL build 14342.
There is similar report in https://github.com/Microsoft/BashOnWindows/issues/286 . MS engineer recognized this and replied that give them feedback on the uservoice for prioritizing, currently it has only 3 votes. -Han Sangjin 2016-06-16 21:17 GMT+09:00 Jongsu Kim via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org>: > Hi, > > This could have been caused by our switch from the BFD linker to gold. >> Could you try linking a hello world program using gold linker and >> running it in WSL? >> > > I tried to build Swift by not using -fuse-gold option and the result was > same. > > > Are you sure that PROT_GROWSDOWN is the flag that enables executable >> stack? I thought that's what PROT_EXEC is for. I'm not sure what >> PROT_GROWSDOWN actually changes, if I were to speculate, I'd say it >> could be a marker that means "this is a stack" or maybe even be just a >> performance hint. >> > > You are right. The executable stack is enabled by PROT_EXEC. > > But Swift shared library's executable stack seems to set PROT_EXEC AND > PROT_GROWSDOWN according to strace. > > I don't know what causes Swift shared library to have executable stack > since Febrary 25 snapshot. Febrary 8 snapshot and Swift 2.X branches have > no such executable stack shared library. > > Thanks, > > > -Kim, Jongsu > > _______________________________________________ > swift-dev mailing list > swift-dev@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev > >
_______________________________________________ swift-dev mailing list swift-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev