Hey joes, do you know anything about the process of actually sending the packages upstream to ubuntu or debian?
> On Sep 16, 2016, at 3:10 PM, Kevin Choi <code.kc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Oops nvm. they are both meaning this swift > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Kevin Choi <code.kc...@gmail.com > <mailto:code.kc...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Huh. Surprised there is no trademark issues. > > aha, I see why. > http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:djnmx6.2.40 > <http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:djnmx6.2.40> > http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:djnmx6.2.41 > <http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:djnmx6.2.41> > > I guess apple-swift would be following the trademark. Not sure what the > OpenSrc community thinks. > -Kevin > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Guillaume DIDIER via swift-dev > <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote: > In either case swift-lang / swiftlang evokes the swift parallel language, not > apple's one. > > A solution to avoid ambiguity would be to use apple[-]swift or a variation of > it. > > Guillaume DIDIER > — > ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE > 91128 PALAISEAU CEDEX <> > M. +33 ( <tel:+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>0 > <tel:+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040>)7 <tel:+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040> > 70 43 18 40 <tel:+33%207%C2%A070%2043%2018%2040> > guillaume.did...@polytechnique.edu > <mailto:guillaume.did...@polytechnique.edu?subject=> > www.polytechnique.edu <http://www.polytechnique.edu/> > — > PS : resent with the right e-mail alias. > > Le 16 sept. 2016 à 00:29, Paulo Faria via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org > <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> a écrit : > >> maybe “swiftlang” is better? >> >> >>> On Sep 14, 2016, at 7:09 PM, Richard Neese via swift-dev >>> <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Ok so well pkgs would have to be swift-lang-corelibs-foundation >>> swift-lang-corelibs-libdispatch and soforth. >>> >>> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows >>> 10 >>> >>> From: Jeff Hajewski via swift-dev <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org> >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 4:51 PM >>> To: Ron Olson <mailto:tachokni...@gmail.com> >>> Cc: swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org> >>> Subject: Re: [swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package >>> >>> Agreed on 'swift-lang'. It doesn't seem like a big issue that 'swift' is >>> already taken. >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Ron Olson via swift-dev >>> <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >>> I am planning on doing something similar with Fedora and figured to call it >>> 'swift-lang', as that seems to be available. >>> Ron >>> On 14 Sep 2016, at 15:16, Richard Neese via swift-dev wrote: >>> The issue is there is already a pkg called swift that is nothing to do with >>> the apple language. >>> >>> >>> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows >>> 10 >>> >>> From: Paulo Faria via swift-dev <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org> >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 1:48 PM >>> To: swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org> >>> Subject: [swift-dev] Debian/Ubuntu Package >>> >>> Hello everyone! >>> >>> Now that Swift 3 is released I think it would be excellent to the community >>> if swift became an official debian/ubuntu package. This way we could >>> install swift by just doing: >>> >>> apt-get install swift >>> >>> I’d like to know if there’s anyone working on this already. If not, I’d >>> love to take the job. I haven’t done this task before so I’d have to find >>> out how as I go, so if anyone has any experience with this, I’d love to get >>> some directions. Thanks! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Paulo >>> _______________________________________________ >>> swift-dev mailing list >>> swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org> >>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev >>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev> >>> >>> >>> >>> <ACB4CA7151EF4CE683249621F8A29D07.png> >>> <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >>> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> swift-dev mailing list >>> swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org> >>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev >>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> swift-dev mailing list >>> swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org> >>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev >>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >>> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >>> <ACB4CA7151EF4CE683249621F8A29D07.png>_______________________________________________ >>> swift-dev mailing list >>> swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org> >>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev >>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-dev mailing list >> swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org> >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev >> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev> > > _______________________________________________ > swift-dev mailing list > swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org> > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev > <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev> > > >
_______________________________________________ swift-dev mailing list swift-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
