> On Mar 6, 2017, at 7:10 PM, Philippe Hausler via swift-dev 
> <swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 5:59 PM, Greg Parker <gpar...@apple.com 
> <mailto:gpar...@apple.com>> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 5:48 PM, Philippe Hausler via swift-dev 
>>> <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Is there a way to mark a function in swift (on Linux) to use the same 
>>> emission strategy as weak declarations in c? 
>>> 
>>> I was to tinkering with some ideas on fixing some poor behavior in 
>>> swift-corelibs-foundation and weak would potentially solve this specific 
>>> case.
>>> 
>>> For reference this is the syntax I am interested in (since it is a bit 
>>> obscure) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_symbol 
>>> <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_symbol>
>> Weak definitions are expensive. What are you trying to do?
>> 
> 
> I was trying to prototype some fixes for factory pattern initializers. The 
> other strategy that I was considering was using hoisting of functions to init 
> methods but that didn't seem to work with disparate types. This wasn't really 
> intended to be a real solution but more so a proof of concept.

Could you be more specific about how you're trying to apply weak definitions to 
the problem?

-Joe
_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

Reply via email to