Looks like this was cherry-picked in swift-clang without PR testing. Thanks, Mishal Shah > On Apr 6, 2017, at 3:17 PM, Slava Pestov <spes...@apple.com> wrote: > > I have a fix pending in this PR: https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/8594 > <https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/8594> > > But I’m surprised this wasn’t caught in CI. > > Slava > >> On Apr 6, 2017, at 2:58 PM, Mishal Shah <mishal_s...@apple.com >> <mailto:mishal_s...@apple.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Slave, >> >> This started after following commits: >> >> https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/9254/ >> <https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/9254/> >> Git (clang) >> >> Change -ffp-contract=fast test to run on Aarch64 (detail >> <https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/9254/changes#detail>) >> Remove -ffp-contract=fast from this test (detail >> <https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/9254/changes#detail>) >> Encapsulate FPOptions and use it consistently (detail >> <https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/9254/changes#detail>) >> Use FPContractModeKind universally (detail >> <https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/9254/changes#detail>) >> Use 'unsigned' for enum bitfields (detail >> <https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/9254/changes#detail>) >> Set FMF for -ffp-contract=fast (detail >> <https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/9254/changes#detail>) >> Add #pragma clang fp (detail >> <https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/9254/changes#detail>) >> Fix sphinx warning from r299470 (detail >> <https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/9254/changes#detail>) >> Another attempt to fix the sphinx warning from r299470 (detail >> <https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/9254/changes#detail>) >> >> Thanks, >> Mishal Shah >>> On Apr 6, 2017, at 2:53 PM, Slava Pestov via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org >>> <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I’m hitting this in github PR testing: >>> >>> /Users/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/swift-PR-osx-smoke-test/branch-master/swift/lib/ClangImporter/ImportDecl.cpp:994:34: >>> error: no matching constructor for initialization of >>> 'clang::BinaryOperator' >>> >>> auto cSetterExpr = new (Ctx) clang::BinaryOperator(cSetterMemberExpr, >>> ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> /Users/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/swift-PR-osx-smoke-test/branch-master/llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/Expr.h:2929:3: >>> note: candidate constructor not viable: no known conversion from 'bool' to >>> 'clang::FPOptions' for 8th argument >>> BinaryOperator(Expr *lhs, Expr *rhs, Opcode opc, QualType ResTy, >>> ^ >>> /Users/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/swift-PR-osx-smoke-test/branch-master/llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/Expr.h:3085:3: >>> note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 9 arguments, but 8 were >>> provided >>> BinaryOperator(Expr *lhs, Expr *rhs, Opcode opc, QualType ResTy, >>> ^ >>> /Users/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/swift-PR-osx-smoke-test/branch-master/llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/Expr.h:3100:3: >>> note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 2 arguments, but 8 were >>> provided >>> BinaryOperator(StmtClass SC, EmptyShell Empty) >>> ^ >>> /Users/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/swift-PR-osx-smoke-test/branch-master/llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/Expr.h:2947:12: >>> note: candidate constructor not viable: requires single argument 'Empty', >>> but 8 arguments were provided >>> explicit BinaryOperator(EmptyShell Empty) >>> ^ >>> /Users/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/swift-PR-osx-smoke-test/branch-master/llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/Expr.h:2913:7: >>> note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: >>> requires 1 argument, but 8 were provided >>> class BinaryOperator : public Expr { >>> ^ >>> /Users/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/swift-PR-osx-smoke-test/branch-master/llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/Expr.h:2913:7: >>> note: candidate constructor (the implicit move constructor) not viable: >>> requires 1 argument, but 8 were provided >>> 1 error generated. >>> >>> Is there a Clang/LLVM merge in progress or something? >>> >>> Slava >>> _______________________________________________ >>> swift-dev mailing list >>> swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org> >>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev >>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev> >> >
_______________________________________________ swift-dev mailing list swift-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
