Or perhaps some subscripts with parameter labels, like
extension Array {
subscript(fromEnd distance: Int) -> Element {
return self[endIndex - distance]
}
}
[0, 1, 2][fromEnd: 1] // returns 2
Jacob Bandes-Storch
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Joe Groff via swift-evolution <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 18, 2015, at 4:42 AM, Amir Michail via swift-evolution <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Examples:
>
> >>> l=[1,2,3,4,5]
> >>> l[-1]
> 5
> >>> l[-2]
> 4
> >>> l[2:4]
> [3, 4]
> >>> l[2:]
> [3, 4, 5]
> >>> l[-2:]
> [4, 5]
> >>> l[:3]
> [1, 2, 3]
> >>> l[::2]
> [1, 3, 5]
> >>> l[::]
> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
>
>
> Accepting negative indices is problematic for two reasons: it imposes
> runtime overhead in the index operation to check the sign of the index;
> also, it masks fencepost errors, since if you do foo[m-n] and n is
> accidentally greater than m, you'll quietly load the wrong element instead
> of trapping. I'd prefer something like D's `$-n` syntax for explicitly
> annotating end-relative indexes.
>
> -Joe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
>
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
