On Mar 24, 2016, at 7:28 PM, John McCall via swift-evolution 
<swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
> I'd actually be much more concerned about the pervasive assumptions about 
> pointer representation in Clang and LLVM than I would be with Swift.
> 
> Now, it would probably be very annoying to support a platform where different 
> pointer types had different null values, but the last of those died awhile 
> ago, I believe.

The last significant one IIRC was Itanium, in the case of C++ member pointers 
(themselves an odd beast), which had a different representation than data 
pointers (-1 is null).

-Chris
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to