> I'd prefer a more general solution instead of introducing the notion of an 
> "optional" function: just make it possible to write default implementations 
> inline in a protocol definition. 

This would work, too. I guess there's no need for an “optional” keyword if the 
implementation is right there in the protocol declaration.

A.

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to