Personally I’d prefer to use a method like:
21.isDivisibleBy(3)
As it’s clearer IMO. My problem with the operator is that it doesn’t make
logical sense to have the value you’re dividing by on the right hand side when
there are equals signs, it seems more like this should be the value you’re
testing. Perhaps there’s a better choice of operator such as:
21 %: 3
Though that’s probably not very clear either as the colon could be easy to
miss. Basically the choice of %== doesn’t suggest its purpose, which makes it
one more thing to learn, which is why a method may be a better choice.
> On 6 Apr 2016, at 17:13, Milos Rankovic via swift-evolution
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>
> Checking for divisibility is very common:
>
> 21 % 3 == 0 // true
>
> In fact, this is such a common use of the `%` operator that the `== 0` side
> of the expression seems distracting in this use case. For quite a while now,
> I’ve been using a custom operator for this, which is steadily growing on me:
>
> 21 %== 3 // true
>
> … which also allows me to overload it for sequences:
>
> 21 %== [7, 3] // true
>
> (If I’m inadvertently misusing this mailing list to share such a minor idea,
> please tell me off so that I can learn not to do it again!)
>
> milos
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
