Is it really great to have a[a.indices.clamped(to: 0 ..< 5)]
instead of a clear a[truncate: 0 ..< 5] ?
and if it is not "a" but "arrayOfSomeValues" we have
arrayOfSomeValues[arrayOfSomeValues.indices.clamped(to: 0 ..< 5)]
Don't feel this is nice.
Is it really so wrong to have additional(to "direct" functions like
"indices.clamped" ) handy and nice-looking methods/subscripts in language?
IMO we all want to have great language. It should be great to code in such
language. Is it great and enjoyable to have strange long construction
instead of handy,clear and explicit expression?
Why don't improve the language in all possible area where we can improve
it? I believe we should improve.
On 13.04.2016 14:09, Pyry Jahkola via swift-evolution wrote:
On 11 Apr 2016, at 15:23, Luis Henrique B. Sousa via swift-evolution
<swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
leta =[1,2,3]
letb =a[0..<5]
print(b)
In the swift-3-indexing-model branch
<https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/swift-3-indexing-model/stdlib/public/core/Range.swift#L94>,
you can /clamp/ a range just like you could clamp intervals in Swift 2. So
the following will work in the way you preferred:
let b = a[a.indices.clamped(to: 0 ..< 5)]
It was suggested to extend `Collection` with a subscript like `a[safe: 0
..< 5]` which resembles the current subsequence subscript
<https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/swift-3-indexing-model/stdlib/public/core/Collection.swift#L82>.
Alternatively,
we could bring collections even closer to ranges by extending them with the
equivalent `.clamped(to:)` method:
let b = a.clamped(to: 0 ..< 5) // "safe" subsequence
— Pyry
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
