Was the syntax fully bikeshedded by the core team before acceptance? Perusing the API guidelines, one could also imagine:
#selector(setting: Person.name) #selector(forSetting: Person.name) On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution < swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > Proposal link: > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0064-property-selectors.md > > Hello Swift Community, > > The review of SE-0064 "Referencing the Objective-C selector of property > getters and setters” ran from April 7...12, 2016. The proposal is > *accepted*. Feedback was light but positive, with many considering this > to effectively be an obviously-missing piece of the #selector proposal ( > SE-0022 > <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0022-objc-selectors.md> > ). > > We welcome an implementation of this proposal. I’ve filed a ticket at > > https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1239 > > to track the implementation. > > - Doug > > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution