-1
I don't see the need for special syntax where a method can be easily used and
is more general.
-Thorsten
> Am 18.04.2016 um 17:28 schrieb Vladimir.S via swift-evolution
> <swift-evolution@swift.org>:
>
> On 15.04.2016 3:57, Hans Huck via swift-evolution wrote:
> > Anyway, why not just make it .step() then, like in Ruby?
> >
> > Instead of a "by" keyword, I'd be happy with syntactic sugar in the form of
> >
> > for i in p1..<p2 step x
>
> As for 'step' word: It seems like for now IMO this is the best suggestion :
> very explicit, anyone knows what "step" means especially in context of loop,
> clear that "step" belongs to for-in construction(not to range itself).
>
> for i in 0..<10 step 2 {
> }
>
> for i in 0..<10 step -2 {
> }
>
> for i in 0.1..<10.5 step 0.5 {
> }
>
> all are mapped to needed ranges/intervals under the hood
> Do you want some custom Range-specific methods to provide steps for loop - no
> problems, use what you need. But don't force any of us to use
> (0..<10).striding(by:2) for myriads of simple loops in our code.
>
> I want to see such constructions in our Swift. Who is with me ? :)
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
