> * What is your evaluation of the proposal? +1 I concur with David Hart: Foundation becoming the base first-class cross platform library seemed concerning when Foundation was build from a paradigm of “Object Everything”. This fits far better with the Swift philosophy of value types where appropriate.
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change > to Swift? Absolutely. As the basis for Swift Frameworks to come, I think it’s essential we do this right. This represents a clear streamlining of “legacy” Foundation with modern Swift. > * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? Yes. This brings Foundation behaviour into line with Swift value-type behaviour. > * If you have you used other languages or libraries with a similar > feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? Not personally. Most of my experience informing this decision relates to Objective-C code, and using Objective-C Foundation in Swift. > * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick > reading, or an in-depth study? A full read, and following the initial discussion of value types in Swift for the past several months. > > More information about the Swift evolution process is available at > > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md > > Thank you, > > -Chris Lattner > Review Manager > > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
