> Am 27.04.2016 um 22:00 schrieb Erica Sadun <er...@ericasadun.com>: > > >> On Apr 27, 2016, at 1:51 PM, Thorsten Seitz via swift-evolution >> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote: >> >> So, you are probably right that Self does not make sense in value types. > > I courteously disagree for the reasons stated in the proposal: > > * Self introduces consistency across types > * It’s succinct and clear, enhancing readability > > It may not be especially expressive in value types but I believe it remains > valuable, which is a different question.
Oops, you are right, of course. Too tired, should catch some sleep now... -Thorsten > > Regardless, I believe this proposal will be delayed until the question of > `Type.self` vs `Type` is first ironed out as some of the design details are > predicated on how that is treated. > > best regards, > > — E >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
