We have that; it’s just ‘!’. :-) Jordan
> On May 2, 2016, at 12:09, Dominik Pich via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > Hello, > often the guard statement is used to only unwrap optionals. multiple guards > will cause a lot of ‘overhead’. > also often if it doesn’t work. there is no easy way we can gracefully recover > ;) > > so how about we do the same as with try/catch where you can use try! and have > a guard! > > the guard! could just throw an exception … > > regards > Dominik > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
