> * What is your evaluation of the proposal? +1. I'm pleased to see an important foundational algorithm added to the standard library.
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to > Swift? Yes. We should have a standard, shared implementation of as many generally useful algorithms as possible, especially those whose implementation is no trivial. > * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? Yes > * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, > how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? As noted in the proposal, it is inspired by STL, which is a very good source of inspiration for generic algorithms. > * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, > or an in-depth study? Quick read of the specific details of the proposal, informed by general familiarity with generic programming and the rotate algorithm. > > More information about the Swift evolution process is available at > > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md > > Thank you, > > -Chris Lattner > Review Manager > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution-announce mailing list > swift-evolution-annou...@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution-announce _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
