I'm ready to submit a pull request: https://github.com/Anton3/swift-evolution/blob/lazy-attribute/proposals/NNNN-lazy-attribute.md
- Anton 2016-05-03 0:25 GMT+03:00 David Sweeris <daveswee...@mac.com>: > Yeah, I was just thinking that we should get the “call-site” syntax > settled for property behaviors, for exactly that reason. > > > On May 2, 2016, at 3:39 PM, Антон Жилин via swift-evolution < > swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > > > One of proposals that will probably be submitted for Swift 4, will be > Property Behaviors propoal. > > > > It aims to generalize @IBOutlet, @synchronized, @delayedinit, and of > course, @lazy. > > (Side note: it would be great if it also included unowned) > > > > Because we aim for less breaking changes in Swift 4, we should prepare > ground for it. > > The suggestion is to rename `lazy` to `@lazy`. > > > > Besides the aforementioned reason, I think, lazy really has its place > among attributes. > > It does not change type of property, it just helps to delay side effects > of initialization. > > > > - Anton > > _______________________________________________ > > swift-evolution mailing list > > swift-evolution@swift.org > > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
