> On May 5, 2016, at 10:16 AM, Jordan Rose via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > >> On May 5, 2016, at 10:03, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution >> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >> >> On May 5, 2016, at 8:59 AM, Alex Hoppen via swift-evolution >> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >>> Say you have the function `foo() -> Int`. Then `foo()` calls `foo` and >>> returns its return value of type `Int` – not a reference to the function of >>> type `Void -> Int`. >> >> Right. >> >> That said, what is wrong with just “foo”? > > As pointed out in the original post, that can refer to both ‘foo()’ and > ‘foo(bar:)’ today.
We could change that, so that to refer to `foo(bar:)` you must use the full compound name. -Joe _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
