That seems reasonable. Onward ho! On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 3:46 PM, David Hart <da...@hartbit.com> wrote:
> > On 09 May 2016, at 00:38, Austin Zheng <austinzh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is the plan to eventually support "multiple" forms of concrete same-type > requirement syntax - the existing "where Element == SomeConcreteType" and > the generic parameterized extensions described elsewhere? If not, the > syntax should probably be discussed as part of a pre-proposal thread before > anything else happens. > > > The way modifications have gone through swift-evolution, it seems like it > would be more logical to implement it with no syntax change first and only > then propose and discuss generic parameterised extensions. >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
