> * What is your evaluation of the proposal? +1 for the idea of making the naming consistent -1 for the actual chosen names
Even after reading the reasoning behind the choice of those words, it took me a time to scratch my head around it. It’s definitely not immediately obvious that Convertible is bi-directional. I would have preferred something much more obvious (even if less grammatically correct): -InputProtocol -OutputProtocol -InputOutputProtocol or BidirectionalProtocol Or: -Inputable -Outputable (got that from Haskell) -InputOutputable or -Bidirectionalable > * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change > to Swift? Yes. > * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? Yes for the idea of making them consistent, no for the names. > * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, > how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? Haskell uses Outputable. > * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick > reading, or an in-depth study? Read the proposal several times. _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
