> On May 16, 2016, at 2:53 PM, John McCall via swift-evolution 
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
> 
>> On May 16, 2016, at 2:06 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution 
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>>> On May 16, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Tim Hawkins <tim.thawk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> At what point would you consider the Linux product to be viable for 
>>> production server side application development. Do you think that goal has 
>>> been achieved in swift 3.0. Or is it going to have to wait for the ABI lock 
>>> down. 
>>> 
>> I'm not an expert in the Linux communities needs and desires.  That said, 
>> from what I understand, they don’t care at all about ABI stability, since 
>> everything is typically built from source.
> 
> I think it would be more appropriate to say that the server development 
> community generally doesn't care deeply about ABI stability (although even 
> there I'm sure there are exceptions).  There are a lot of client-side efforts 
> that have very different requirements from that, though.

Our ABI considerations are also undeniably going to be Apple-focused. Anyone 
serious about building a client-side Swift platform on Linux should probably 
vet our decisions to ensure they make sense for their purposes too.

-Joe
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to