> > * What is your evaluation of the proposal? +1. IIRC this wasn't always required and I was bummed when the requirement was introduced. Good riddance. That said, I wouldn't mind if .self was kept as an alternative as Brent has requested.
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to > Swift? Yes. > * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? Yes. > * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, > how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? Similar response as Brent with regards to Ruby. > * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, > or an in-depth study? Followed the discussion and read the proposal. > > More information about the Swift evolution process is available at > > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md > > Thank you, > > -Chris Lattner > Review Manager > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution-announce mailing list > swift-evolution-annou...@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution-announce _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution