> Le 23 mai 2016 à 23:21, Knut Lorenzen via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> a écrit : > > >> On 19 May 2016, at 19:18, John McCall <rjmcc...@apple.com> wrote: >> >> That is not at all true. The dynamic OOP languages do not, as a rule, have >> any access control at all. Java and C# default to package access, which is >> analogous to internal. C++ is, as always, complicated and different. > > Class members are private by default in both Java and C#. As are ivars and > selectors in Objective-C (the latter having to be redeclared in the header > file for module-wide access). Swift definitely gives greater default scope to > class members in comparison to other OOP languages.
On Java, they are package-private, not private by default, which is closer to module visibility of swift than private. > > Knut > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
