On Mon, May 23, 2016, at 03:15 PM, Max Moiseev wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Thanks for reviewing this proposal. > > It is my poor choice of words to be blamed for the confusion. There is > definitely no reason for the new property to only be available for the > MutableRandomAccessSlice type. Moreover, since all the slice types are > generated with GYB now, it would be more code ;-) > > The intention is to add the new property to ALL the slice types.
Ah hah, you're right, I missed the following line when reading: > The same change is applicable to both mutable and immutable slice types. So +1, though I'm still in favor of renaming `_base` to `base` and then adding a computed `_base` property back if the stdlib breakage is too high. -Kevin Ballard _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
