> On May 24, 2016, at 7:43 AM, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On May 24, 2016, at 12:59 AM, Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>> I have a small remark though, wouldn’t it be better to let transform be of 
>>> type (Key, Value) throws -> T instead of (Value) throws -> T? You can just 
>>> ignore the key (with _) if you don’t need it, but I think it might come in 
>>> handy in some cases.
>> 
>> The problem is, that closes the door to writing many simple maps in 
>> functional style. For instance, this:
>> 
>>   dictionaryOfNumbers.mapValues(abs)
>> 
>> Would have to become this:
>> 
>>   dictionaryOfNumbers.mapValues { _, v in abs(v) }
>> 
>> (It *might* be possible to do it with `$1`, but I'm not sure; there are some 
>> limitations around that.)
>> 
>> A value-value map is just simpler and cleaner, while almost always giving 
>> you what you need.
> 
> +1.  
> 
> I don't think I have ever mapped keys.  Incidentally, that doesn't have the 
> usual semantics of a map operation as you can produce duplicate keys.

I think this conversation suffers from not knowing whether Dictionary is going 
to receive a sequence-based initializer. There's been a proposal for that in 
the PR queue for quite a while. Could someone in the core team please either 
merge or close that proposal?

https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/pull/125

If there's no sequence-based init, mapValues should probably produce a new 
Dictionary. If there is, having mapValues produce a dictionary would be 
redundant. I'd rather see a MapDictionary type that wraps a dictionary and only 
evaluates the transformation on access, rather than eagerly allocating storage 
and performing all the transformations.

You can take a look at a rudimentary MapDictionary in this gist: 
https://gist.github.com/natecook1000/7cfc5c04f18237066f7aca6e9658f276

Best,
Nate

>> -- 
>> Brent Royal-Gordon
>> Architechies
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to