> On May 25, 2016, at 3:29 PM, Matthew Johnson <matt...@anandabits.com> wrote: > On May 25, 2016, at 3:56 PM, Erica Sadun <er...@ericasadun.com > <mailto:er...@ericasadun.com>> wrote: >> I wouldn't be pushing if I thought it wouldn't be useful after cascading. If >> no other reason, it offers a way to duplicate/modify value types to be >> stored into constants. That alone should argue for its value. > > Can you point us to the latest draft of what you have in mind for cascading > in the future?
Haven't really touched it since I got the "sit and wait" but I've come around to preferring Dartism. -- E
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
