On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Jacob Bandes-Storch <jtban...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> If it's worth continuing the discussion in this thread, I rather like the
> MemoryLayout<T>.size idea. For discoverability, we might want to have
> @availability(*, unavailable, message: "use MemoryLayout<T>.size, etc.")
> public init(){}.
>

It's a nice syntax, but I'm not fully comfortable with the suggestion that
sizeofValue(), etc. should go.  Also, I wonder about the static vs. dynamic
type issue here (despite having started the last thread, I still haven't
sat down to think it through).
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to