If there is no proposal yet, I could write one. We should sketch out what we
should consider for nested protocols. I’d love to see this feature in Swift 3.
:)
Should this be allowed? I’m not sure what and what not we’ll see of generics in
Swift 3.
// A<Int>.P1
class A<T> {
protocol P1: class {}
}
// B<Int>.P2
class B<T> {}
extension B where T == Int {
protocol P2: class {}
}
For non-generics its a welcome addition:
// C.P3
class C {
protocol P3 {}
}
In my project I’d use this like TCP.Data.Convertible where Convertible is the
protocol sitting on my Data type.
--
Adrian Zubarev
Sent with Airmail
Am 12. Juni 2016 um 15:13:41, Adrian Zubarev (adrian.zuba...@devandartist.com)
schrieb:
What is the status for this idea? I can’t find the proposal for this. :(
--
Adrian Zubarev
Sent with Airmail
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
