> Le 16 juin 2016 à 11:29, Charlie Monroe via swift-evolution 
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> a écrit :
> 
> Have you considered just #if os(mac)? I mean the fact that you're testing 
> against "OS" is already expressed. I know it goes against the other values 
> (watchOS, tvOS), but I'd personally drop those as well in favor of simplier 
> os(watch), os(tv).

OS is part of the name of the OS, so it should be kept. In a crazy parallel 
universe, you would not want to use:
#if os(/2)
to refer to OS/2, just because OS feels redundant. Or in more realistic one, 
you would not want to avoid redundancy with a condition like:
#if phone(i)

Dany

> This would go along the various Swift 3 improvements where e.g. 
> NSFileManager.defaultManager() became simply FileManager.default (thus 
> dropping the unnecessary "Manager")...
> 
> But I understand if you're against it, considering that these are really 
> trademarks and official OS names...
> 
> 
>> On Jun 16, 2016, at 4:29 PM, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution 
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Starting in Sierra, Apple's Mac-based OS is renamed to macOS.
>> 
>> All user-facing Swift APIs must go through Swift Evolution. While this is a 
>> trivial API change, I have put together a formal proposal as is normal and 
>> usual for this process. Here is a draft for public comment.
>> 
>>  -- Erica
>> 
>> Gist:  https://gist.github.com/erica/f53fa6cfef9e5cf17ab139f7528edde2
>> 
>> Aliasing the OS X Platform Configuration Test
>> Proposal: TBD
>> Author: Erica Sadun
>> Status: TBD
>> Review manager: TBD
>> Introduction
>> 
>> This proposal adds a #if os(macos) platform configuration test to Swift that 
>> acts like the current if os(osx)
>> 
>> Swift Evolution Discussion: TBD
>> 
>> Motivation
>> 
>> Apple renamed its Mac operating system from OSX to macOS, starting in macOS 
>> Sierra. Adding rather than replacing "OSX" enables this adoption to be 
>> purely additive and supports the notion that Swift-based applications could 
>> be deployed to operating systems earlier than Sierrra.
>> 
>> Current Art
>> 
>> Swift currently supports the following platform configuration tests, defined 
>> in lib/Basic/LangOptions.cpp.
>> 
>> The literals true and false
>> The os() function that tests for OSX, iOS, watchOS, tvOS, Linux, Windows, 
>> Android, and FreeBSD
>> The arch() function that tests for x86_64, arm, arm64, i386, powerpc64, 
>> s390x, and powerpc64le
>> The swift() function that tests for specific Swift language releases, e.g. 
>> swift(>=2.2)
>> Detailed Design
>> 
>>   if (Target.isMacOSX()) {
>>     addPlatformConditionValue("os", "OSX");
>>     addPlatformConditionValue("os", "macOS");
>>   }
>> Impact on Existing Code
>> 
>> This is purely additive
>> 
>> Alternatives Considered
>> 
>> I think it's unwise to replace OSX instead of adding macOS due to Apple's 
>> large and active userbase that may install Swift-sourced software and not 
>> upgrade to the latest operating system.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution@swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to