I’m not saying its necessarily *easy* to type, but I think its good enough to 
warrant the elegance of having only one escaping character instead of multiple.

> On 22 Jun 2016, at 01:08, Brandon Knope via swift-evolution 
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
> 
> Actually… we can go pretty scientific on this sort of thing and heat map 
> keyboard usage to get a better picture of how “usable” this is.
> 
> I pasted a file that contains seven \’s in it and heat mapped it at 
> https://www.patrick-wied.at/projects/heatmap-keyboard/ 
> <https://www.patrick-wied.at/projects/heatmap-keyboard/>
> 
> Even *with* several \’s throughout my source file the majority of my key 
> presses take place much closer to the $ key than the \ key.
> 
> I think we can all argue about what is clearer or not, but I think for the 
> majority of us, the \ key is quite inconvenient compared to the keys around 
> where we type the most.
> 
> I also ran several of iOS 10’s sample code through the heat map and continue 
> to get pretty similar results: the \ is much further from the hottest part of 
> the keyboard than the ones closer to where your hand usually rests.
> 
> Maybe this is flawed, but I think it is hard to argue that the \ is easy to 
> type when there are far more usable alternatives.
> 
> Brandon
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jun 21, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Daniel Resnick via swift-evolution 
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> I also disagree for the same reasons that Gwynne and Brent mentioned: I find 
>> '\(...)' easy to read, fine to type, and consistent with other string 
>> escaping syntax.
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution 
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
>> > I find that typing \(var) is very disruptive to my typing flow. The more I 
>> > code in Swift, the more I like it, but every time I'm coding and then have 
>> > to hiccup while typing \ then ( causes me to be annoyed. I know, it's 
>> > minor, but it isn't a key combination that flows quickly.
>> >
>> > I would much rather have $() or perhaps ${} (like Groovy lang) or perhaps 
>> > @() to go along with other uses of @ throughout the language.
>> 
>> Even though I'm used to Perl's and Ruby's interpolation syntaxes, I 
>> immediately liked `\(…)`. It's parsimonious: Rather than taking a third 
>> character (besides \ and ") to mean something special in a string literal, 
>> it reuses one of the existing ones. There's no need to escape a character 
>> you wouldn't otherwise have to touch, or to think of another character as 
>> "magical" in a string. It fits nicely with the rest of the syntax, with `\` 
>> indicating a special construct and then `()` delimiting an expression, just 
>> as they do elsewhere in the language. It's an elegant solution to a problem 
>> traditionally solved inelegantly. It's very Swifty in that way.
>> 
>> > A shifted key, like $ or @, followed by another shifted key like (, allows 
>> > for a much faster flow and they are much closer to the home keys than \ 
>> > which is nearly as far from home keys as possible (and awkward).
>> 
>> 
>> I don't have any trouble typing it personally. If you find yourself 
>> accidentally typing `\9` or `|(`, we could probably offer an error for the 
>> former or warning for the latter with a fix-it. But if you're complaining 
>> that it takes a tiny fraction of a second longer to type than `$(` would, 
>> then honestly, I just can't bring myself to care. Swift optimizes for code 
>> reading. If we wanted to optimize for code typing instead, we'd have a very 
>> different style.
>> 
>> --
>> Brent Royal-Gordon
>> Architechies
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to