> On Jul 11, 2016, at 4:49 PM, Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> As for all of the other additive changes, I would strongly prefer you to 
> *wait* on even proposing or discussing these things until after the Swift 3.0 
> evolution cycle is done.  Not only is it distracting for the community, but 
> the core team and many others won’t be be able to even read the thread or the 
> responses, thus your discussion cycle will be lacking key input.
> 
> On this topic, we specifically discussed this when labeled breaks were being 
> designed, and when they were expanded to “do” in Swift 2.  We specifically 
> decided to allow break but not continue, because we didn’t want these control 
> flow statements to be “another way to spell a loop”.
> 
> -Chris

So I can take it as a given that this is out of scope for Swift 3 too?

https://gist.github.com/erica/a78045d09fa5bb20e6e566295140c84d 
<https://gist.github.com/erica/a78045d09fa5bb20e6e566295140c84d>


-- E


_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to