> On 20 Jul 2016, at 14:55, Tino Heth <2...@gmx.de> wrote: > > >> Am 17.07.2016 um 18:31 schrieb Haravikk <swift-evolut...@haravikk.me>: >> >> I may move discussion of other collection types to its own section though, >> to make the core proposal as simple as possible, and leave it up to the core >> team whether to do that part. > imho this is a good idea: Its increased power is a major argument for the > proposal, but the schedule seems to be very tight already… and I guess the > discussion about possible problems caused by variadic functions which can be > called with an explicit collection could be a real distraction, whereas the > basic idea is so clear that there shouldn't be any valid reasons to not > accept it.
I've created a new pull request for this, you can view the updated file here: https://github.com/Haravikk/swift-evolution/blob/a13dc03d6a8c76b25a30710d70cbadc1eb31b3cd/proposals/nnnn-variadics-as-attribute.md Hopefully it's still clear; I know I have a nasty tendency to be overly verbose with wording and stuff, though the first example should keep the meat of the proposal straightforward =) _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
