> On 14 Oct 2016, at 20:59, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution 
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
> 
>       * What is your evaluation of the proposal?

Not in favour, sorry. While I've used this kind of pattern in Javascript I just 
don't see what it really adds compared to a more explicit name. As a general 
rule I prefer everything to be explicitly named except where a case is 
genuinely trivial (like the dollar syntax for closure arguments).

>       * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change 
> to Swift?

If it had more benefits maybe, but I just don't see them.

>       * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?

No, I think that allowing the dollar sign could be confusing alongside dollar 
sign variables in closures, and I feel that Swift is better being explicit 
where possible.

>       * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, 
> how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?

It's similar to a lot of Javascript libraries that use the dollar sign for 
values, but I've never felt that I was really gaining anything significant by 
using it as a variable name.

>       * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick 
> reading, or an in-depth study?

Quick read.
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to