> On Oct 31, 2016, at 1:22 PM, William Sumner via swift-evolution
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 31, 2016, at 1:11 PM, Kenny Leung via swift-evolution
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>>
>> OK then, how about an extension to the proposal that says “guard variable
>> always implies guard unwrap variable when the only thing present in the
>> guard clause is an optional or list of optionals”?
>>
>> So you could write
>>
>> guard foo else {
>> }
>>
>> guard foo, bar else {
>> }
>>
>> -Kenny
>
>
> That would enable some strange-looking code:
>
> var foo: Bool?
> guard foo, foo else {}
>
> Preston
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
I missed the part where you require only optionals in the clause. However, I
still don’t like the visual ambiguity between testing boolean expressions and
unwrapping optionals.
Preston
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
