Just gotta field a version of that proposal that doesn’t “look like Haskell” :)

Seriously, though, would there be any objection to restoring the old behavior 
of just silently ignoring perfect duplicates of operator definitions across 
frameworks sans proposal?

> On Nov 10, 2016, at 10:54 AM, Joe Groff <jgr...@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Nov 10, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Jay Abbott via swift-evolution 
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Would it make sense to allow some kind of operator aliasing on import, so 
>> that developers can at least work-around library conflicts?
> 
> Definitely. I think something like the import improvements Robert Widmann was 
> proposing a while back are sorely needed, not only for operators but for 
> managing conflicts in general.
> 
> -Joe

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to