> On Jan 26, 2017, at 12:19 PM, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>
> Locking down ABI when all foreseeable desirable changes are additive is one
> thing. But doing so before we get there feels premature.
I fully agree that locking down the ABI prematurely would be detrimental to the
long-term future of the language.
Part of the point of the ABI manifesto is to scope out what are the desirable
or critical changes needed before ABI gets locked down. From that we can have
concrete discussions on what’s left to be done, how much work it will take to
get there, etc.
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
