Oh, I misread the arrows in that diagram and this makes much more sense now.
Thanks. On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Stephen Canon <sca...@apple.com> wrote: > The bitwise stuff isn't on ArithMETic | ARITHmetic | Number | whatever. > > On Jan 27, 2017, at 9:13 AM, T.J. Usiyan via swift-evolution < > swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > Regarding `Number` or `Numeric`: Does everything in Arithmetic apply to > complex numbers and do we want it to? The bitwise stuff is where I think > that there might be a mismatch. > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution < > swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > >> >> on Sun Jan 15 2017, Stephen Canon <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >> >> > Responding to the thread in general here, not so much any specific >> email: >> > >> > “Arithmetic” at present is not a mathematically-precise concept, and >> > it may be a mistake to make it be one[1]; it’s a >> > mathematically-slightly-fuzzy “number” protocol. >> >> >> In that case, should we consider renaming it to “Numeric” or even >> “Number?” That would at least remove the question about how to >> pronounce it. >> >> >> -- >> -Dave >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> swift-evolution@swift.org >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >> > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > > >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution