> On Feb 1, 2017, at 9:52 AM, Nevin Brackett-Rozinsky > <nevin.brackettrozin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Drafting a proposal sounds like a good idea, to establish all the relevant > information in one place. I don’t recall off the top of my head what > directions Jaden sketched out, but as long as the proposal hits the high > points of the uses and benefits, and summarizes the discussion and > alternatives, it should be fine. > > I might suggest using Chris’s terminology of “one-sided range”, because that > is both more precise and it renders moot all the “incomplete” vs “infinite” > hairsplitting.
I recommend reading through the discussion Xiaodi and I had yesterday, which Jaden chimed in on. We really do need to make a distinction between incomplete and infinite ranges if we want to support all of the use cases with clean semantics. This isn’t hair splitting. > > Nevin _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
