As of today, this is possible: prefix operator ¬ prefix func ¬ (value: Bool) -> Bool { return !value }
let t = true let f = ¬t I have to admit that I quite like this but it has a couple drawbacks: 1: if you've never seen the ¬ operator in math it makes no more sense than "!" 2: It's quite tricky to find on your keyboard depending on your layout 3: maybe ~ is a better fit? Seems like a lot of work for a very small improvement. But I'm all for it. André > On 15 Feb 2017, at 22:28, Derrick Ho via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > There is no need to change it > > Since the context basically disambiguates the meaning of ! > > The next best thing is to compare it to false > > (val == false) // same as !val > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:02 PM David Waite via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote: > If someone came with a nice syntax I’d be for this. I can’t imagine what that > would be. > > I doubt there is an alternate prefix or postfix operator that would pass > muster, due to ‘!’ already meaning the appropriate thing in so many > languages, and swift only supporting symbolic operators. > > I can’t think of a method on boolean which would read properly either, e.g. > > if isValid.not() {…} > > The closest I could think to a decent bike shed color would be a global > function: > > if not(isValid) {…} > > -DW > >> On Feb 15, 2017, at 11:10 AM, Robert Widmann via swift-evolution >> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote: >> >> So you've identified the problem, but what do you propose as a solution >> here? >> >> It should be noted that a (non-stdlib) language-level answer to this >> question has already been discussed and rejected >> (https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/2015-December/000032.html >> <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/2015-December/000032.html>). >> >> ~Robert Widmann >> >> 2017/02/15 9:02、Sadiq via swift-evolution <swift-evolution@swift.org >> <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> のメッセージ: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would like to suggest to change Logical NOT Operator from ! to something >>> else. >>> It will increase the readability of the code and will avoid any confusion >>> with the symbol used for force unwrapping of optional values. >>> It would be easier for new programmers to learn Swift as the first >>> language. >>> I don't understand the rational behind using the same operator for two >>> different purposes. >>> >>> Thanks and Regards, >>> Mohammad Sadiq >>> _______________________________________________ >>> swift-evolution mailing list >>> swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org> >>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org> >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution> > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org> > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution> > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution