> On Feb 17, 2017, at 08:21, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>
> I haven’t yet read all the feedback in this topic but I’d like to throw some
> bikeshedding of mine into the room. :)
>
> How about this?
>
> Version 1: func(pure) …
> Version 2: func label(…) ~> ReturnType
Version 2 is going to upset those who use "~>" as an operator.
As the # of possible attributes grows, having an obvious grouping mechanism for
them, like version 1, might be worthwhile simply to help make the list clearer.
What about allowing "@(list, of, attributes)" instead of "@list, @of,
@attributes"?
- Dave Sweeris
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
