> On Feb 17, 2017, at 11:03 AM, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > I suggest we need to find a way to shorten the list of the possible error > types with a the help of typeallias > > extension MyError1: Error { ... } > extension MyError2: Error { ... } > extension MyError3: Error { ... } > > typealias MyErrors = MyError1 | MyError2 | MyError3 > > func foo() throws(MyErrors) -> MyResult > func bar<T : Error>(_: () throws(T) -> Void) rethrows(MyErrors, T) -> MyResult Do you actually need that? Experience in other languages like Rust and Haskell that use Result-based error propagation suggests that a single error type is adequate, and beneficial in many ways. If nothing else, you could `Either` your way to multiple errors if you really needed to.
IMO, if we accept a single error type per function, there could be a simpler model for this. We could say that the `throws` type is a generic parameter of all function types, and it defaults to the uninhabited `Never` type for functions that don't throw. () -> () == () throws Never -> () () throws -> () == () throws Error -> () In this model, you'd get many benefits: - `rethrows` could become first-class, reducing down to just polymorphic `throws`: func foo(_: () throws -> ()) rethrows // Swift 3 func foo<T: Error>(_: () throws T -> ()) throws T // Swift X func foo<T: Error>(_: () throws T -> ()) throws Either<MyErrors, T> - Protocols could abstract over error handling; for instance, we could support throwing sequences: protocol IteratorProtocol { associatedtype Element associatedtype Error: Swift.Error = Never mutating func next() throws Error -> Element? } Separate of the type system model, the type *checking* model also deserves thorough consideration. Propagating the effects of possibly multiple error types propagating within a `do` block is much trickier than doing so as a single "throws" or not bit, especially if you want to be able to use type context in `catch` patterns or to implicitly propagate a narrower `throws` type out of the enclosing function. -Joe
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution