> On Feb 17, 2017, at 11:29 AM, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > >> On Feb 17, 2017, at 1:24 PM, Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution >> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote: >> >> Let's not bring bikeshedding the commonly proposed and rejected union >> spelling into this. >> Typed throws would be a nice addition, assuming that the core team finds it >> in scope for phase 2. It seems only logical that any type can be thrown >> (i.e. conforms to Error) should be permitted to be listed in `throws()`. > > Agree. Typed throws should have a single thrown type. Making it more > convenient to throw and catch more than one error type with typed throws > without having to manually create a wrapper is an orthogonal issue. David > Owens convinced me of this last year when we had a thread on the topic.
+1 -Chris
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
