Please respond to that email thread rather than this one. Thank you. -- E
> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:25 PM, David Waite <da...@alkaline-solutions.com> wrote: > > I don’t fully understand - are you saying to comment on the gist as if it > were a discussion forum? > > -DW > >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:25 PM, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution >> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote: >> >> I've put together everything I have about cases and unwrapping here: >> >> https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20170306/033588.html >> >> <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20170306/033588.html> >> >> So please move the discussion there. Thanks! -- E >> >> >>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 8:47 PM, T.J. Usiyan <griotsp...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:griotsp...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> I support the first part, removing `case let` in a switch. I actually >>> prefer one let out front in many ways but I have a much stronger preference >>> for eliminating a 'style' choice that dramatically impacts the >>> interpretation of the code. Binding each value is more explicit, so I am >>> fine with it winning. >> >> I've broken it down to its own problem/solution >> >>> >>> The `if case` stuff… I don't really agree with as much. >> >> I grant it's one of the things that would have gone down much better way >> earlier in Swift's development timeline, but that kept getting pushed >> forward again and again. >> >>> >>> TJ >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution >>> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote: >>> Bug report filed with warning emitting request: >>> >>> https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4174 >>> <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4174> >>> >>> -- E >>> >>>> On Mar 1, 2017, at 1:58 PM, Pyry Jahkola <pyry.jahk...@iki.fi >>>> <mailto:pyry.jahk...@iki.fi>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I guess I should also include the example where the user actually wanted >>>> the oldValue to be "x": >>>> >>>> if case let .two(newValue, value) = example, value == oldValue { ... } >>>> >>>> No surprises there, even if another conditional is required. >>>> >>>> — Pyry >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org> >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
