Dave,
> I’m ok with doing it as an extension on `Comparable`, although we should
> add an overload for regular ranges, too.
Yeah, I completely agree and for now I'll drop the topic of removing the
global definitions for min / max.
So the aim of this proposal would be to add `clamp` to both `Range` and
`Comparable`.
- Nick
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 6:16 PM, David Sweeris <daveswee...@mac.com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 10, 2017, at 1:12 AM, Nicholas Maccharoli via swift-evolution <
> swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>
> Sorry for sidetracking by talking about dumping the global definitions of
> `min` and `max` but if that could be done and it were decided by the swift
> community that adding a clamp function would be appropriate, I guess with
> the array implementations of min / max the clamp function might be
> implemented like this?
>
> extension Comparable {
>
> func clamped(to range: ClosedRange<Self>) -> Self {
>
> return [range.lowerBound, [self, range.upperBound].min()!].max()!
>
> }
>
> }
>
> I’m ok with doing it as an extension on `Comparable`, although we should
> add an overload for regular ranges, too.
>
> - Dave Sweeris
>
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
