I am confused. Half of my email was about how to encapsulate smaller than the
entire submodule using ‘module { }'
> On Mar 25, 2017, at 6:39 AM, Brent Royal-Gordon <br...@architechies.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mar 25, 2017, at 12:32 AM, Jonathan Hull via swift-evolution
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
>>
>> • Remove ‘private’ keyword
>> • Rename ‘fileprivate’ to ‘local’ with the understanding it now means
>> local to the containing submodule
>> • If no submodule is declared, the file is its own anonymous submodule
>
>
> This is kind of not the place for a full submodule discussion, but: I don't
> think a submodule system which doesn't have a unit of encapsulation smaller
> than the entire submodule is going to work.
>
> --
> Brent Royal-Gordon
> Architechies
>
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
