> On Apr 6, 2017, at 4:10 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > What is your evaluation of the proposal? -1 I don't see how this "breaking" change is better than just reverting SE-025.
SE-169 complicates private by making it even closer to fileprivate. It technically reverts most of the SE-025 functionality. If this proposal is desired then just out right revert SE-025. > Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to > Swift? Yes > Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? No. > If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do > you feel that this proposal compares to those? Swift 2 and 3 > How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or > an in-depth study? Participated in previous discussions.
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
