> • What is your evaluation of the proposal? +1 This is a small, but very useful addition. I like the argument label `into`, and using it to distinguish between the two implementations.
> • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change > to Swift? Yes. Reducing and accumulating into structures like arrays or dictionaries can be very powerful. > • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? Yes. It makes it easier for developers to write higher level code with good, predictable performance. > • If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, > how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? I don't recall other languages that provide different implementations of higher order functions with different performance characteristics. However, I've used other languages that provide different data structure implementations with different performance characteristics. > • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick > reading, or an in-depth study? A quick reading of the proposal and the other reviews so far. Regards, David _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
